MAYOR’S £3.7M STAFF SPAFF

CRUMBRIA: 15.3.2026: EXCLUSIVE

THE new bureaucratic empire being built in Cumbria ahead of next year’s incoming Mayor will spaff £3.7m on mouse clickers, the Chronic can exclusively reveal.

The new Crumbria Combined Authority opens the trough for the first time on Wednesday and documents show it will also need a whopping £11.2m to run itself in 2026/27.

From a staffing point of view, the Gravy Train will require:

£1.5m for former Enterprising Cumbria staff
£1.2m on corporate staff
£703,000 on service lead and policy staff
£296,000 on project delivery/project management staff
Half-a-million to pay for next year’s Mayoral election
The salary for Mayor and Deputy Mayor has not yet been set
A panel of wonks (expenses for their time) will decide it!
Two new committees requiring dozens of councillors
Also being set up are one group, one panel, and two boards!

In April last year, in our story headlined “Mayoral Gravy Train On The Move”, the Chronic warned you of the VULGAR annual costs of keeping these new Gravy Trains on the rails.

As we wrote back then:

“Mayors and devolution in Cumbria means high pay and generous pensions; plush offices stuffed with bloated teams of over-paid directors; legal wonks; HR droids; pen-pushers; cushion plumpers; facilitators; administrators; note-takers and non-jobbers.“

Remember! This is the huge new political bureaucracy that nearly 60% of Cumbrians told politicians they didn’t want in a public consultation last year (results at the bottom of this page).

Yet Labour-daft Crumberland Council and the Lib-Dem dictatorship in charge of Wokemoreland Council PRESSED AHEAD anyway.

They want their political parties closely associated with doling out millions of pounds on Cumbrian projects using money from Whitehall.

It’s why all the parties are jostling to get their candidate elected as Mayor.

***Get your snouts ready! Click to go to agenda.***

The new Crumbria Combined Gravy Train Board meets for the first time next week.

Sharing the steering wheel will be Cllr Jonathan Brook, (Lib Dem), of Wokemoreland & Farcical, and Cllr Mark Fryer, (Labour), of Crumberland Council – the good cop/bad cop routine.

Shovelling the coal will be John Barradell OBE, the ‘interim’ new chief executive of Crumbria Combined Authority. He was previously a public sector big shot in Westminster and Brighton and doesn’t come cheap.

He’ll struggle by on circa £155,000 a year. He gets the job permanently at tomorrow’s meeting.

He’ll be supported, naturally, by a newly-appointed Spin Doctor on upto £60k-a-year.

Former Newsquest hackette, Emily Woolfe, has been recruited to handle comms and reputational management.

That’s public sector code for spinning the local rags, tv and radio, to ensure a blizzard of untroublesome headlines, of which she is more than over qualified.

The agenda and reports for tomorrow’s meeting are a word salad running to more than 380-pages of A4!

While you’re working – they’re talking.

Don’t forget that the new Mayor, who will be elected in May 2027, will eventually add ANOTHER line to your annual Council Tax bills to pay for their prowess.

***

Share this story

If you like this story, please give us a like on Facebook if you can and help support what we do, thanks.

Follow the Chronic on Facebook

READ MORE: CUMBRIA’S GRAVY TRAIN MAYOR

READ MORE: CUMBRIA SAYS ‘NO’ TO MAYOR

The tell-tale public consultation results

These results are from the 1,200+ members of the public who took part, and the four parish councils and two town councils which bothered to fill in last year’s Government questionnaire.

Q1: To what extent do you agree or disagree that establishing a Mayoral Combined Authority (MCA) will deliver benefits to the area?

Public: 58% disagree. Parish councils: 100% disagree.

Q2: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the proposed governance arrangements for the MCA?

Public: 59% disagree. Parish councils: 75% disagree.

Q3: To what extent do you agree or disagree that an MCA will support the economy of the area?

Public: 56% disagree. Parish councils: 75% disagree.

Q4: To what extent do you agree or disagree that an MCA will improve social outcomes in the area?

Public: 57% disagree. Parish councils: 50% disagree.

Q5: To what extent do you agree or disagree that an MCA will improve local government services in the area?

Public: 61% disagree. Parish councils: 75% disagree.

Q6: To what extent do you agree or disagree that an MCA will improve the local natural environment and overall national environment?

Public 63% disagree. Parish councils: 100%.